Jasminer X16-Q vs Jasminer X16-Q pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Jasminer X16-Q | Specification | Jasminer X16-Q pro |
|---|---|---|
| 1,950.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 2.1 GH/s |
| 620 W | Consommation électrique | 520 W |
| 317,948.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 253,658.5 J/TH |
| 40 dB | Niveau de bruit | 40 dB |
| — | Weight | 10.0 kg |
| 2,115 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,774 BTU/hr |
| 65/100 | Home Mining Score | 65/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | EtHash |
| Jasminer | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
Jasminer X16-Q
Jasminer X16-Q pro
Based on BTC price of $78,186 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Jasminer X16-Q pro comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 3 (efficacité, consommation électrique). The standout gap is 20% better efficacité (317,949 vs 253,659 J/TH) in the Jasminer X16-Q pro's favour. The Jasminer X16-Q holds the edge in rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Jasminer X16-Q and Jasminer X16-Q pro diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Jasminer X16-Q pro 5% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Jasminer X16-Q pro 16% better power draw (620 vs 520 W)
- Jasminer X16-Q pro 20% better efficacité (317,949 vs 253,659 J/TH)
- Jasminer X16-Q 19% more heat output (2,115 vs 1,774 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Jasminer X16-Q | Metric | Jasminer X16-Q pro |
|---|---|---|
| $789 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,249 |
| -$1.49 | Daily net profit | -$1.25 |
| -$1,332 | Net after 1 year | -$1,704 |
| -$1,875 | Net after 2 years | -$2,160 |
| -$2,418 | Net after 3 years | -$2,615 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Jasminer X16-Q pro253,658.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Jasminer X16-Q vs Jasminer X16-Q pro: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Jasminer X16-Q pro is more profitable at $-1.25/day compared to $-1.49/day for the Jasminer X16-Q. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Jasminer X16-Q or Jasminer X16-Q pro?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Jasminer X16-Q or Jasminer X16-Q pro?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
Jasminer X16-Q vs Jasminer X16-Q pro: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Jasminer X16-Q runs at 317,948.7 J/TH while the Jasminer X16-Q pro runs at 253,658.5 J/TH — a difference of 64,290.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 20% better efficacité (317,949 vs 253,659 J/TH).