Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)
Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) vs Jasminer X16-P
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) | Specification | Jasminer X16-P |
|---|---|---|
| 750.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 5.8 GH/s |
| 1,350 W | Consommation électrique | 1,900 W |
| 1,800,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 327,586.2 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 8,100.0 kg | Weight | 14.0 kg |
| 4,606 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,483 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | EtHash |
| Innosilicon | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)
Jasminer X16-P
Based on BTC price of $78,230 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Jasminer X16-P edges it: 3 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 673% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the Jasminer X16-P's favour. That said, the Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) and Jasminer X16-P sit on each measurable spec:
- Jasminer X16-P 673% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) 29% better power draw (1,350 vs 1,900 W)
- Jasminer X16-P 82% better efficacité (1,800,000 vs 327,586 J/TH)
- Jasminer X16-P 100% better weight (8,100.0 vs 14.0 kg)
- Jasminer X16-P 41% more heat output (4,606 vs 6,483 BTU/hr)
- Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) 11% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 28.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) | Metric | Jasminer X16-P |
|---|---|---|
| $800 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,550 |
| -$3.24 | Daily net profit | -$4.56 |
| -$1,983 | Net after 1 year | -$4,214 |
| -$3,165 | Net after 2 years | -$5,879 |
| -$4,348 | Net after 3 years | -$7,543 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Jasminer X16-P327,586.2 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) or the Jasminer X16-P?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) is more profitable at $-3.24/day compared to $-4.56/day for the Jasminer X16-P. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) or Jasminer X16-P?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) vs Jasminer X16-P: which fits a residential setup better?
The Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Jasminer X16-P). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) and Jasminer X16-P?
The Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) runs at 1,800,000.0 J/TH while the Jasminer X16-P runs at 327,586.2 J/TH — a difference of 1,472,413.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 82% better efficacité (1,800,000 vs 327,586 J/TH).
Compare Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) with...
- Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) vs Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)
- Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) vs Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)
- Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) vs Innosilicon A11 Pro
- Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) vs Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)
- Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) vs Innosilicon A4 Dominator
- Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) vs Innosilicon A4+ LTCMaster