Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)
Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A6 LTCMaster
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) | Specification | Innosilicon A6 LTCMaster |
|---|---|---|
| 1.5 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.2 GH/s |
| 2,350 W | Consommation électrique | 1,500 W |
| 1,566,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,219,512.2 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| — | Weight | 7,550.0 kg |
| 8,018 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 5,118 BTU/hr |
| 26/100 | Home Mining Score | 34/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Innosilicon | Manufacturer | Innosilicon |
Profitability Comparison
Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)
Innosilicon A6 LTCMaster
Based on BTC price of $78,237 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Innosilicon A6 LTCMaster comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 4 (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique). Its biggest concrete edge: 36% better power draw (2,350 vs 1,500 W). That said, the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) and Innosilicon A6 LTCMaster diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) 22% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Innosilicon A6 LTCMaster 36% better power draw (2,350 vs 1,500 W)
- Innosilicon A6 LTCMaster 22% better efficacité (1,566,667 vs 1,219,512 J/TH)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) 57% more heat output (8,018 vs 5,118 BTU/hr)
- Innosilicon A6 LTCMaster 31% more score de minage domestique (26.0 vs 34.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) | Metric | Innosilicon A6 LTCMaster |
|---|---|---|
| $1,200 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,299 |
| -$5.64 | Daily net profit | -$3.60 |
| -$3,259 | Net after 1 year | -$2,613 |
| -$5,317 | Net after 2 years | -$3,927 |
| -$7,376 | Net after 3 years | -$5,241 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Innosilicon A6 LTCMasterScore: 34/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Innosilicon A6 LTCMaster1,219,512.2 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) or the Innosilicon A6 LTCMaster?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Innosilicon A6 LTCMaster is more profitable at $-3.60/day compared to $-5.64/day for the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A6 LTCMaster: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) or the Innosilicon A6 LTCMaster?
The Innosilicon A6 LTCMaster scores 34/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) and Innosilicon A6 LTCMaster?
The Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) runs at 1,566,666.7 J/TH while the Innosilicon A6 LTCMaster runs at 1,219,512.2 J/TH — a difference of 347,154.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 22% better efficacité (1,566,667 vs 1,219,512 J/TH).
Compare Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) with...
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A11 Pro
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A4 Dominator
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A4+ LTCMaster