Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)
Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)
Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) vs Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) | Specification | Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) |
|---|---|---|
| 500.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.5 GH/s |
| 750 W | Consommation électrique | 2,350 W |
| 1,500,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,566,666.7 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 8,100.0 kg | Weight | — |
| 2,559 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 8,018 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Etchash | Algorithme | EtHash |
| Innosilicon | Manufacturer | Innosilicon |
Profitability Comparison
Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)
Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)
Based on BTC price of $78,158 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh), which leads on 3 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique). Where it pulls away hardest is 68% better power draw (750 vs 2,350 W). The Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) holds the edge in hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) and Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) 200% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) 68% better power draw (750 vs 2,350 W)
- Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) 4% better efficacité (1,500,000 vs 1,566,667 J/TH)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) 213% more heat output (2,559 vs 8,018 BTU/hr)
- Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) 15% more score de minage domestique (30.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) | Metric | Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) |
|---|---|---|
| $2,150 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,200 |
| -$1.80 | Daily net profit | -$5.64 |
| -$2,807 | Net after 1 year | -$3,259 |
| -$3,464 | Net after 2 years | -$5,317 |
| -$4,121 | Net after 3 years | -$7,376 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)Score: 30/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)1,500,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) vs Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) is more profitable at $-1.80/day compared to $-5.64/day for the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) or the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) or the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)?
The Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) and Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) on J/TH?
The Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) runs at 1,500,000.0 J/TH while the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) runs at 1,566,666.7 J/TH — a difference of 66,666.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 4% better efficacité (1,500,000 vs 1,566,667 J/TH).
Compare Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) with...
- Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) vs Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)
- Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) vs Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)
- Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) vs Innosilicon A11 Pro
- Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) vs Innosilicon A4 Dominator
- Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) vs Innosilicon A4+ LTCMaster
Compare Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) with...
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A11 Pro
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A4 Dominator
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A4+ LTCMaster
