Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)
Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) | Specification | iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 |
|---|---|---|
| 1.5 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 260.0 MH/s |
| 2,350 W | Consommation électrique | 220 W |
| 1,566,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 846,153.9 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 40 dB |
| — | Weight | 2.1 kg |
| 8,018 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 751 BTU/hr |
| 26/100 | Home Mining Score | 66/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | EtHash |
| Innosilicon | Manufacturer | iPollo |
Profitability Comparison
Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)
iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260
Based on BTC price of $78,223 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260, which leads on 4 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 91% better power draw (2,350 vs 220 W) in the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260's favour. The Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) holds the edge in hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) and iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) 477% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 91% better power draw (2,350 vs 220 W)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 46% better efficacité (1,566,667 vs 846,154 J/TH)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) 968% more heat output (8,018 vs 751 BTU/hr)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 154% more score de minage domestique (26.0 vs 66.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) | Metric | iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,200 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $650 |
| -$5.64 | Daily net profit | -$0.53 |
| -$3,259 | Net after 1 year | -$843 |
| -$5,317 | Net after 2 years | -$1,035 |
| -$7,376 | Net after 3 years | -$1,228 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260Score: 66/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260846,153.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) or iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 is more profitable at $-0.53/day compared to $-5.64/day for the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) or the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 is quieter at 40 dB compared to the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260: which fits a residential setup better?
The iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 scores 66/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) and iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260?
The Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) runs at 1,566,666.7 J/TH while the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 runs at 846,153.9 J/TH — a difference of 720,512.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 46% better efficacité (1,566,667 vs 846,154 J/TH).
Compare Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) with...
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A11 Pro
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A4 Dominator
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A4+ LTCMaster