Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell CK-BOX
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Specification | Goldshell CK-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| 54.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.1 TH/s |
| 530 W | Consommation électrique | 215 W |
| 9,814,814.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 204.8 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | 45 dB |
| 3.0 kg | Weight | 2.0 kg |
| 1,808 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 734 BTU/hr |
| 65/100 | Home Mining Score | 59/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Eaglesong |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX II
Goldshell CK-BOX
Based on BTC price of $77,900 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell CK-BOX edges it: 4 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 100% better efficacité (9,814,815 vs 205 J/TH). The Goldshell AE-BOX II claws back ground on score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell CK-BOX actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell CK-BOX 1944344% more hashrate (0.0 vs 1.1 TH/s)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 59% better power draw (530 vs 215 W)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 100% better efficacité (9,814,815 vs 205 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 22% better noise (35.0 vs 45.0 dB)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 32% better weight (3.0 vs 2.0 kg)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 147% more heat output (1,808 vs 734 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 10% more score de minage domestique (65.0 vs 59.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Metric | Goldshell CK-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| $120 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $399 |
| -$1.27 | Daily net profit | -$0.48 |
| -$584 | Net after 1 year | -$574 |
| -$1,049 | Net after 2 years | -$748 |
| -$1,513 | Net after 3 years | -$923 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOX IIScore: 65/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell CK-BOX204.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell CK-BOX: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell CK-BOX is more profitable at $-0.48/day compared to $-1.27/day for the Goldshell AE-BOX II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE-BOX II or the Goldshell CK-BOX better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell CK-BOX at 45 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE-BOX II or the Goldshell CK-BOX?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 59/100 for the Goldshell CK-BOX). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell CK-BOX?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II runs at 9,814,814.8 J/TH while the Goldshell CK-BOX runs at 204.8 J/TH — a difference of 9,814,610.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (9,814,815 vs 205 J/TH).