Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell Mini-DOGE III
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Specification | Goldshell Mini-DOGE III |
|---|---|---|
| 54.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 800.0 MH/s |
| 530 W | Consommation électrique | 500 W |
| 9,814,814.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 625,000.0 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | 55 dB |
| 3.0 kg | Weight | 3.2 kg |
| 1,808 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,706 BTU/hr |
| 65/100 | Home Mining Score | 62/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX II
Goldshell Mini-DOGE III
Based on BTC price of $78,230 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell Mini-DOGE III, which leads on 3 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 94% better efficacité (9,814,815 vs 625,000 J/TH) in the Goldshell Mini-DOGE III's favour. That said, the Goldshell AE-BOX II isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell Mini-DOGE III diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE III 1381% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE III 6% better power draw (530 vs 500 W)
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE III 94% better efficacité (9,814,815 vs 625,000 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 36% better noise (35.0 vs 55.0 dB)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 8% better weight (3.0 vs 3.2 kg)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 6% more heat output (1,808 vs 1,706 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 5% more score de minage domestique (65.0 vs 62.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Metric | Goldshell Mini-DOGE III |
|---|---|---|
| $120 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $499 |
| -$1.27 | Daily net profit | -$1.20 |
| -$584 | Net after 1 year | -$937 |
| -$1,049 | Net after 2 years | -$1,375 |
| -$1,513 | Net after 3 years | -$1,813 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOX IIScore: 65/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell Mini-DOGE III625,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AE-BOX II or Goldshell Mini-DOGE III more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell Mini-DOGE III is more profitable at $-1.20/day compared to $-1.27/day for the Goldshell AE-BOX II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE-BOX II or Goldshell Mini-DOGE III?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell Mini-DOGE III at 55 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE-BOX II or Goldshell Mini-DOGE III?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 62/100 for the Goldshell Mini-DOGE III). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell Mini-DOGE III?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II runs at 9,814,814.8 J/TH while the Goldshell Mini-DOGE III runs at 625,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 9,189,814.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 94% better efficacité (9,814,815 vs 625,000 J/TH).