Goldshell MINI DOGE III (650Mh)
Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell MINI DOGE III (650Mh)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Specification | Goldshell MINI DOGE III (650Mh) |
|---|---|---|
| 54.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 650.0 MH/s |
| 530 W | Consommation électrique | 400 W |
| 9,814,814.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 615,384.6 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 3.0 kg | Weight | 2.3 kg |
| 1,808 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,365 BTU/hr |
| 65/100 | Home Mining Score | 34/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX II
Goldshell MINI DOGE III (650Mh)
Based on BTC price of $78,230 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell MINI DOGE III (650Mh), which leads on 3 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 94% better efficacité (9,814,815 vs 615,385 J/TH). That said, the Goldshell AE-BOX II isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell MINI DOGE III (650Mh) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell MINI DOGE III (650Mh) 1104% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell MINI DOGE III (650Mh) 25% better power draw (530 vs 400 W)
- Goldshell MINI DOGE III (650Mh) 94% better efficacité (9,814,815 vs 615,385 J/TH)
- Goldshell MINI DOGE III (650Mh) 22% better weight (3.0 vs 2.3 kg)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 33% more heat output (1,808 vs 1,365 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 91% more score de minage domestique (65.0 vs 34.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Metric | Goldshell MINI DOGE III (650Mh) |
|---|---|---|
| $120 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $199 |
| -$1.27 | Daily net profit | -$0.96 |
| -$584 | Net after 1 year | -$549 |
| -$1,049 | Net after 2 years | -$900 |
| -$1,513 | Net after 3 years | -$1,250 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOX IIScore: 65/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell MINI DOGE III (650Mh)615,384.6 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE-BOX II or the Goldshell MINI DOGE III (650Mh)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell MINI DOGE III (650Mh) is more profitable at $-0.96/day compared to $-1.27/day for the Goldshell AE-BOX II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell MINI DOGE III (650Mh): which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell MINI DOGE III (650Mh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE-BOX II or Goldshell MINI DOGE III (650Mh)?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 34/100 for the Goldshell MINI DOGE III (650Mh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell MINI DOGE III (650Mh)?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II runs at 9,814,814.8 J/TH while the Goldshell MINI DOGE III (650Mh) runs at 615,384.6 J/TH — a difference of 9,199,430.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 94% better efficacité (9,814,815 vs 615,385 J/TH).