Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Specification | Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 54.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 205.0 MH/s |
| 530 W | Consommation électrique | 220 W |
| 9,814,814.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,073,170.7 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 3.0 kg | Weight | 2,000.0 kg |
| 1,808 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 751 BTU/hr |
| 65/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX II
Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro
Based on BTC price of $78,230 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 4 (efficacité, consommation électrique). The standout gap is 89% better efficacité (9,814,815 vs 1,073,171 J/TH) in the Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro's favour. The Goldshell AE-BOX II claws back ground on score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro 280% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro 58% better power draw (530 vs 220 W)
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro 89% better efficacité (9,814,815 vs 1,073,171 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 100% better weight (3.0 vs 2,000.0 kg)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 141% more heat output (1,808 vs 751 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 110% more score de minage domestique (65.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Metric | Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro |
|---|---|---|
| $120 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$1.27 | Daily net profit | -$0.53 |
| -$584 | Net after 1 year | -$193 |
| -$1,049 | Net after 2 years | -$385 |
| -$1,513 | Net after 3 years | -$578 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOX IIScore: 65/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro1,073,170.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AE-BOX II or Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro is more profitable at $-0.53/day compared to $-1.27/day for the Goldshell AE-BOX II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II runs at 9,814,814.8 J/TH while the Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro runs at 1,073,170.7 J/TH — a difference of 8,741,644.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 89% better efficacité (9,814,815 vs 1,073,171 J/TH).