Goldshell AE Card vs Goldshell CK-BOX
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Card | Specification | Goldshell CK-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| 5.5 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.1 TH/s |
| 65 W | Consommation électrique | 215 W |
| 11,818,181.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 204.8 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 0.3 kg | Weight | 2,000.0 kg |
| 222 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 734 BTU/hr |
| 71/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Eaglesong |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Card
Goldshell CK-BOX
Based on BTC price of $77,900 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Goldshell CK-BOX l'emporte sur 3 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 19090809% more hashrate (0.0 vs 1.1 TH/s). The Goldshell AE Card claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE Card and Goldshell CK-BOX sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell CK-BOX 19090809% more hashrate (0.0 vs 1.1 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE Card 70% better power draw (65.0 vs 215.0 W)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 100% better efficacité (11,818,182 vs 205 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Card 100% better weight (0.3 vs 2,000.0 kg)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 231% more heat output (222 vs 734 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Card 129% more score de minage domestique (71.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AE Card | Metric | Goldshell CK-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| $99 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $190 |
| -$0.16 | Daily net profit | -$0.48 |
| -$156 | Net after 1 year | -$365 |
| -$213 | Net after 2 years | -$539 |
| -$270 | Net after 3 years | -$714 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE CardScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell CK-BOX204.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE Card or the Goldshell CK-BOX?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE Card is more profitable at $-0.16/day compared to $-0.48/day for the Goldshell CK-BOX. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE Card or the Goldshell CK-BOX better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell AE Card is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell CK-BOX at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE Card or the Goldshell CK-BOX?
The Goldshell AE Card scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Goldshell CK-BOX). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE Card and Goldshell CK-BOX on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE Card runs at 11,818,181.8 J/TH while the Goldshell CK-BOX runs at 204.8 J/TH — a difference of 11,817,977.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (11,818,182 vs 205 J/TH).