Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell CK-BOX
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max | Specification | Goldshell CK-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| 360.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.1 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Consommation électrique | 215 W |
| 9,166,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 204.8 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | 2,000.0 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 734 BTU/hr |
| 50/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Eaglesong |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max
Goldshell CK-BOX
Based on BTC price of $77,900 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell CK-BOX, which leads on 4 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 100% better efficacité (9,166,667 vs 205 J/TH). That said, the Goldshell AE Max isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell CK-BOX diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell CK-BOX 291567% more hashrate (0.0 vs 1.1 TH/s)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 93% better power draw (3,300 vs 215 W)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 100% better efficacité (9,166,667 vs 205 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Max 99% better weight (13.5 vs 2,000.0 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max 1435% more heat output (11,260 vs 734 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Max 61% more score de minage domestique (50.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE Max | Metric | Goldshell CK-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| $870 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $190 |
| -$7.92 | Daily net profit | -$0.48 |
| -$3,761 | Net after 1 year | -$365 |
| -$6,652 | Net after 2 years | -$539 |
| -$9,542 | Net after 3 years | -$714 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE MaxScore: 50/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell CK-BOX204.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE Max or the Goldshell CK-BOX?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell CK-BOX is more profitable at $-0.48/day compared to $-7.92/day for the Goldshell AE Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE Max or Goldshell CK-BOX?
The Goldshell AE Max is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Goldshell CK-BOX at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell CK-BOX: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell AE Max scores 50/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Goldshell CK-BOX). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell CK-BOX?
The Goldshell AE Max runs at 9,166,666.7 J/TH while the Goldshell CK-BOX runs at 204.8 J/TH — a difference of 9,166,461.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (9,166,667 vs 205 J/TH).