Goldshell Mini DOGE III (500Mh)
Goldshell AE Card vs Goldshell Mini DOGE III (500Mh)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Card | Specification | Goldshell Mini DOGE III (500Mh) |
|---|---|---|
| 5.5 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 500.0 MH/s |
| 65 W | Consommation électrique | 260 W |
| 11,818,181.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 520,000.0 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 0.3 kg | Weight | 2.3 kg |
| 222 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 887 BTU/hr |
| 71/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Card
Goldshell Mini DOGE III (500Mh)
Based on BTC price of $78,230 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Le Goldshell AE Card et le Goldshell Mini DOGE III (500Mh) sont très proches sur l'ensemble de nos facteurs de notation, sans avantage décisif pour l'un ou l'autre. Votre choix devrait dépendre de vos priorités spécifiques — consultez les spécifications et l'analyse de rentabilité ci-dessus.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE Card and Goldshell Mini DOGE III (500Mh) sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell Mini DOGE III (500Mh) 8991% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE Card 75% better power draw (65.0 vs 260.0 W)
- Goldshell Mini DOGE III (500Mh) 96% better efficacité (11,818,182 vs 520,000 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Card 86% better weight (0.3 vs 2.3 kg)
- Goldshell Mini DOGE III (500Mh) 300% more heat output (222 vs 887 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Card 129% more score de minage domestique (71.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE Card | Metric | Goldshell Mini DOGE III (500Mh) |
|---|---|---|
| $99 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $749 |
| -$0.16 | Daily net profit | -$0.62 |
| -$156 | Net after 1 year | -$977 |
| -$213 | Net after 2 years | -$1,205 |
| -$270 | Net after 3 years | -$1,432 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE CardScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell Mini DOGE III (500Mh)520,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE Card vs Goldshell Mini DOGE III (500Mh): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE Card is more profitable at $-0.16/day compared to $-0.62/day for the Goldshell Mini DOGE III (500Mh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE Card vs Goldshell Mini DOGE III (500Mh): which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AE Card is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell Mini DOGE III (500Mh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE Card or the Goldshell Mini DOGE III (500Mh)?
The Goldshell AE Card scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Goldshell Mini DOGE III (500Mh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE Card and Goldshell Mini DOGE III (500Mh)?
The Goldshell AE Card runs at 11,818,181.8 J/TH while the Goldshell Mini DOGE III (500Mh) runs at 520,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 11,298,181.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 96% better efficacité (11,818,182 vs 520,000 J/TH).