Goldshell Mini DOGE III (500Mh)
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell Mini DOGE III (500Mh)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max II | Specification | Goldshell Mini DOGE III (500Mh) |
|---|---|---|
| 540.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 500.0 MH/s |
| 3,200 W | Consommation électrique | 260 W |
| 5,925,925.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 520,000.0 J/TH |
| 85 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 12.5 kg | Weight | 2.3 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 887 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max II
Goldshell Mini DOGE III (500Mh)
Based on BTC price of $78,230 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell Mini DOGE III (500Mh) comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 5 (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 92% better power draw (3,200 vs 260 W). That said, the Goldshell AE Max II isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell Mini DOGE III (500Mh) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell AE Max II 8% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell Mini DOGE III (500Mh) 92% better power draw (3,200 vs 260 W)
- Goldshell Mini DOGE III (500Mh) 91% better efficacité (5,925,926 vs 520,000 J/TH)
- Goldshell Mini DOGE III (500Mh) 82% better weight (12.5 vs 2.3 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max II 1131% more heat output (10,918 vs 887 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell Mini DOGE III (500Mh) 7% more score de minage domestique (29.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE Max II | Metric | Goldshell Mini DOGE III (500Mh) |
|---|---|---|
| $1,050 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $749 |
| -$7.68 | Daily net profit | -$0.62 |
| -$3,853 | Net after 1 year | -$977 |
| -$6,656 | Net after 2 years | -$1,205 |
| -$9,460 | Net after 3 years | -$1,432 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell Mini DOGE III (500Mh)Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell Mini DOGE III (500Mh)520,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AE Max II or Goldshell Mini DOGE III (500Mh) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell Mini DOGE III (500Mh) is more profitable at $-0.62/day compared to $-7.68/day for the Goldshell AE Max II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell Mini DOGE III (500Mh): which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AE Max II is quieter at 85 dB compared to the Goldshell Mini DOGE III (500Mh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE Max II or the Goldshell Mini DOGE III (500Mh)?
The Goldshell Mini DOGE III (500Mh) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 29/100 for the Goldshell AE Max II). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell Mini DOGE III (500Mh) on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE Max II runs at 5,925,925.9 J/TH while the Goldshell Mini DOGE III (500Mh) runs at 520,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 5,405,925.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 91% better efficacité (5,925,926 vs 520,000 J/TH).