Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell Byte
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max | Specification | Goldshell Byte |
|---|---|---|
| 360.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 5.5 MH/s |
| 3,300 W | Consommation électrique | 140 W |
| 9,166,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 25,454,545.5 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Niveau de bruit | 35 dB |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | 0.4 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 478 BTU/hr |
| 50/100 | Home Mining Score | 65/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Zksnark |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max
Goldshell Byte
Based on BTC price of $78,235 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Le Goldshell AE Max et le Goldshell Byte sont très proches sur l'ensemble de nos facteurs de notation, sans avantage décisif pour l'un ou l'autre. Votre choix devrait dépendre de vos priorités spécifiques — consultez les spécifications et l'analyse de rentabilité ci-dessus.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell Byte sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell AE Max 6445% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell Byte 96% better power draw (3,300 vs 140 W)
- Goldshell AE Max 64% better efficacité (9,166,667 vs 25,454,545 J/TH)
- Goldshell Byte 36% better noise (55.0 vs 35.0 dB)
- Goldshell Byte 97% better weight (13.5 vs 0.4 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max 2257% more heat output (11,260 vs 478 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell Byte 30% more score de minage domestique (50.0 vs 65.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE Max | Metric | Goldshell Byte |
|---|---|---|
| $870 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $59 |
| -$7.92 | Daily net profit | -$0.34 |
| -$3,761 | Net after 1 year | -$182 |
| -$6,652 | Net after 2 years | -$304 |
| -$9,542 | Net after 3 years | -$427 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell ByteScore: 65/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell AE Max9,166,666.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell Byte: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell Byte is more profitable at $-0.34/day compared to $-7.92/day for the Goldshell AE Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell Byte: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell Byte is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell AE Max at 55 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell Byte: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell Byte scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 50/100 for the Goldshell AE Max). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell Byte on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE Max runs at 9,166,666.7 J/TH while the Goldshell Byte runs at 25,454,545.5 J/TH — a difference of 16,287,878.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 64% better efficacité (9,166,667 vs 25,454,545 J/TH).