Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell KD-BOX Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max | Specification | Goldshell KD-BOX Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 360.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 2.6 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Consommation électrique | 75 W |
| 9,166,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 28.9 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Niveau de bruit | 35 dB |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | 1.1 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 256 BTU/hr |
| 50/100 | Home Mining Score | 71/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max
Goldshell KD-BOX Pro
Based on BTC price of $78,237 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell KD-BOX Pro edges it: 6 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better efficacité (9,166,666.7 vs 28.9 J/TH). Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell KD-BOX Pro diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell KD-BOX Pro 722122% more hashrate (0.0 vs 2.6 TH/s)
- Goldshell KD-BOX Pro 98% better power draw (3,300.0 vs 75.0 W)
- Goldshell KD-BOX Pro 100% better efficacité (9,166,666.7 vs 28.9 J/TH)
- Goldshell KD-BOX Pro 36% better noise (55.0 vs 35.0 dB)
- Goldshell KD-BOX Pro 92% better weight (13.5 vs 1.1 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max 4300% more heat output (11,260 vs 256 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell KD-BOX Pro 42% more score de minage domestique (50.0 vs 71.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE Max | Metric | Goldshell KD-BOX Pro |
|---|---|---|
| $870 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $699 |
| -$7.92 | Daily net profit | -$0.09 |
| -$3,761 | Net after 1 year | -$731 |
| -$6,652 | Net after 2 years | -$762 |
| -$9,542 | Net after 3 years | -$794 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell KD-BOX ProScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell KD-BOX Pro28.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell KD-BOX Pro: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell KD-BOX Pro is more profitable at $-0.09/day compared to $-7.92/day for the Goldshell AE Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE Max or Goldshell KD-BOX Pro?
The Goldshell KD-BOX Pro is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell AE Max at 55 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell KD-BOX Pro: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell KD-BOX Pro scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 50/100 for the Goldshell AE Max). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell KD-BOX Pro: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AE Max runs at 9,166,666.7 J/TH while the Goldshell KD-BOX Pro runs at 28.9 J/TH — a difference of 9,166,637.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (9,166,666.7 vs 28.9 J/TH).