Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell LT5 Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max | Specification | Goldshell LT5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 360.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 2.5 GH/s |
| 3,300 W | Consommation électrique | 3,100 W |
| 9,166,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,265,306.1 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | 8,500.0 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,577 BTU/hr |
| 50/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max
Goldshell LT5 Pro
Based on BTC price of $78,241 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell LT5 Pro, which leads on 4 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 86% better efficacité (9,166,667 vs 1,265,306 J/TH). That said, the Goldshell AE Max isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell LT5 Pro actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell LT5 Pro 581% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell LT5 Pro 6% better power draw (3,300 vs 3,100 W)
- Goldshell LT5 Pro 86% better efficacité (9,166,667 vs 1,265,306 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Max 100% better weight (13.5 vs 8,500.0 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max 6% more heat output (11,260 vs 10,577 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Max 127% more score de minage domestique (50.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE Max | Metric | Goldshell LT5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| $870 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $800 |
| -$7.92 | Daily net profit | -$7.44 |
| -$3,761 | Net after 1 year | -$3,516 |
| -$6,652 | Net after 2 years | -$6,231 |
| -$9,542 | Net after 3 years | -$8,947 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE MaxScore: 50/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell LT5 Pro1,265,306.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell LT5 Pro: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell LT5 Pro is more profitable at $-7.44/day compared to $-7.92/day for the Goldshell AE Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell LT5 Pro: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AE Max is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Goldshell LT5 Pro at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE Max or the Goldshell LT5 Pro?
The Goldshell AE Max scores 50/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell LT5 Pro). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell LT5 Pro on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE Max runs at 9,166,666.7 J/TH while the Goldshell LT5 Pro runs at 1,265,306.1 J/TH — a difference of 7,901,360.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 86% better efficacité (9,166,667 vs 1,265,306 J/TH).