Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell X6S
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max | Specification | Goldshell X6S |
|---|---|---|
| 360.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.8 GH/s |
| 3,300 W | Consommation électrique | 2,250 W |
| 9,166,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,264,044.9 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | 5.0 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,677 BTU/hr |
| 50/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max
Goldshell X6S
Based on BTC price of $78,233 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Goldshell X6S l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique). Where it pulls away hardest is 86% better efficacité (9,166,667 vs 1,264,045 J/TH). The Goldshell AE Max holds the edge in score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell X6S diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell X6S 394% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell X6S 32% better power draw (3,300 vs 2,250 W)
- Goldshell X6S 86% better efficacité (9,166,667 vs 1,264,045 J/TH)
- Goldshell X6S 63% better weight (13.5 vs 5.0 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max 47% more heat output (11,260 vs 7,677 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Max 92% more score de minage domestique (50.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE Max | Metric | Goldshell X6S |
|---|---|---|
| $870 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$7.92 | Daily net profit | -$5.40 |
| -$3,761 | Net after 1 year | -$1,971 |
| -$6,652 | Net after 2 years | -$3,942 |
| -$9,542 | Net after 3 years | -$5,913 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE MaxScore: 50/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell X6S1,264,044.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AE Max or Goldshell X6S more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell X6S is more profitable at $-5.40/day compared to $-7.92/day for the Goldshell AE Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell X6S: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AE Max is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Goldshell X6S at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell X6S: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell AE Max scores 50/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Goldshell X6S). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell X6S?
The Goldshell AE Max runs at 9,166,666.7 J/TH while the Goldshell X6S runs at 1,264,044.9 J/TH — a difference of 7,902,621.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 86% better efficacité (9,166,667 vs 1,264,045 J/TH).