Iceriver AE2 720Mh vs Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver AE2 720Mh | Specification | Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) |
|---|---|---|
| 720.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 2.0 GH/s |
| 1,300 W | Consommation électrique | 3,580 W |
| 1,805,555.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,790,000.0 J/TH |
| 60 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 15.5 kg | Weight | 15.0 kg |
| 4,436 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 12,215 BTU/hr |
| 52/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Zksnark |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver AE2 720Mh
Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s)
Based on BTC price of $75,723 and current network difficulty as of Mar 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Le Iceriver AE2 720Mh et le Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) sont très proches sur l'ensemble de nos facteurs de notation, sans avantage décisif pour l'un ou l'autre. Votre choix devrait dépendre de vos priorités spécifiques — consultez les spécifications et l'analyse de rentabilité ci-dessus.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver AE2 720MhScore: 52/100. 60 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s)1,790,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Iceriver AE2 720Mh or Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver AE2 720Mh is more profitable at $-3.12/day compared to $-8.59/day for the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Iceriver AE2 720Mh or Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s)?
The Iceriver AE2 720Mh is quieter at 60 dB compared to the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Iceriver AE2 720Mh or Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s)?
The Iceriver AE2 720Mh scores 52/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Iceriver AE2 720Mh and Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s)?
The Iceriver AE2 720Mh runs at 1,805,555.6 J/TH while the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) runs at 1,790,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 15,555.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs.