Iceriver AE2 720Mh vs IceRiver KS0
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver AE2 720Mh | Specification | IceRiver KS0 |
|---|---|---|
| 720.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 100.0 GH/s |
| 1,300 W | Consommation électrique | 65 W |
| 1,805,555.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 650.0 J/TH |
| 60 dB | Niveau de bruit | 35 dB |
| 15.5 kg | Weight | 2.5 kg |
| 4,436 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 222 BTU/hr |
| 52/100 | Home Mining Score | 71/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver AE2 720Mh
IceRiver KS0
Based on BTC price of $78,236 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the IceRiver KS0, which leads on 6 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better efficacité (1,805,556 vs 650 J/TH). Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Iceriver AE2 720Mh and IceRiver KS0 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- IceRiver KS0 13789% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.1 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS0 95% better power draw (1,300.0 vs 65.0 W)
- IceRiver KS0 100% better efficacité (1,805,556 vs 650 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS0 42% better noise (60.0 vs 35.0 dB)
- IceRiver KS0 84% better weight (15.5 vs 2.5 kg)
- Iceriver AE2 720Mh 1900% more heat output (4,436 vs 222 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver KS0 37% more score de minage domestique (52.0 vs 71.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Iceriver AE2 720Mh | Metric | IceRiver KS0 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,595 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $99 |
| -$3.12 | Daily net profit | -$0.15 |
| -$2,734 | Net after 1 year | -$155 |
| -$3,873 | Net after 2 years | -$210 |
| -$5,011 | Net after 3 years | -$266 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver KS0Score: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
IceRiver KS0650.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Iceriver AE2 720Mh or the IceRiver KS0?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS0 is more profitable at $-0.15/day compared to $-3.12/day for the Iceriver AE2 720Mh. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Iceriver AE2 720Mh or the IceRiver KS0 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The IceRiver KS0 is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Iceriver AE2 720Mh at 60 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Iceriver AE2 720Mh or the IceRiver KS0?
The IceRiver KS0 scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 52/100 for the Iceriver AE2 720Mh). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Iceriver AE2 720Mh and IceRiver KS0 on J/TH?
The Iceriver AE2 720Mh runs at 1,805,555.6 J/TH while the IceRiver KS0 runs at 650.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,804,905.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (1,805,556 vs 650 J/TH).