Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite vs IceRiver KS0
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite | Specification | IceRiver KS0 |
|---|---|---|
| 300.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 100.0 GH/s |
| 500 W | Consommation électrique | 65 W |
| 1,666,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 650.0 J/TH |
| 45 dB | Niveau de bruit | 35 dB |
| 4.0 kg | Weight | 2.5 kg |
| 1,706 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 222 BTU/hr |
| 62/100 | Home Mining Score | 71/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite
IceRiver KS0
Based on BTC price of $78,236 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the IceRiver KS0, which leads on 6 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 100% better efficacité (1,666,667 vs 650 J/TH) in the IceRiver KS0's favour. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite and IceRiver KS0 sit on each measurable spec:
- IceRiver KS0 33233% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.1 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS0 87% better power draw (500.0 vs 65.0 W)
- IceRiver KS0 100% better efficacité (1,666,667 vs 650 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS0 22% better noise (45.0 vs 35.0 dB)
- IceRiver KS0 38% better weight (4.0 vs 2.5 kg)
- Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite 669% more heat output (1,706 vs 222 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver KS0 15% more score de minage domestique (62.0 vs 71.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite | Metric | IceRiver KS0 |
|---|---|---|
| $979 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $99 |
| -$1.20 | Daily net profit | -$0.15 |
| -$1,417 | Net after 1 year | -$155 |
| -$1,855 | Net after 2 years | -$210 |
| -$2,293 | Net after 3 years | -$266 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver KS0Score: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
IceRiver KS0650.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite vs IceRiver KS0: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS0 is more profitable at $-0.15/day compared to $-1.20/day for the Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite or the IceRiver KS0 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The IceRiver KS0 is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite at 45 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite vs IceRiver KS0: which fits a residential setup better?
The IceRiver KS0 scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 62/100 for the Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite and IceRiver KS0?
The Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite runs at 1,666,666.7 J/TH while the IceRiver KS0 runs at 650.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,666,016.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (1,666,667 vs 650 J/TH).