Iceriver AL3 vs IceRiver KS0
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver AL3 | Specification | IceRiver KS0 |
|---|---|---|
| 15.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 100.0 GH/s |
| 3,500 W | Consommation électrique | 65 W |
| 233.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 650.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 35 dB |
| 16.0 kg | Weight | 2.5 kg |
| 11,942 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 222 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 71/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver AL3
IceRiver KS0
Based on BTC price of $78,226 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Iceriver AL3, which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 14900% more hashrate (15.0 vs 0.1 TH/s). The IceRiver KS0 claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Iceriver AL3 and IceRiver KS0 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Iceriver AL3 14900% more hashrate (15.0 vs 0.1 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS0 98% better power draw (3,500.0 vs 65.0 W)
- Iceriver AL3 64% better efficacité (233 vs 650 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS0 53% better noise (75.0 vs 35.0 dB)
- IceRiver KS0 84% better weight (16.0 vs 2.5 kg)
- Iceriver AL3 5284% more heat output (11,942 vs 222 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver KS0 97% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 71.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Iceriver AL3 | Metric | IceRiver KS0 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,550 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $99 |
| -$7.86 | Daily net profit | -$0.15 |
| -$4,419 | Net after 1 year | -$155 |
| -$7,288 | Net after 2 years | -$210 |
| -$10,157 | Net after 3 years | -$266 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver KS0Score: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver AL3233.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Iceriver AL3 or the IceRiver KS0?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS0 is more profitable at $-0.15/day compared to $-7.86/day for the Iceriver AL3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Iceriver AL3 or IceRiver KS0?
The IceRiver KS0 is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Iceriver AL3 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Iceriver AL3 or IceRiver KS0?
The IceRiver KS0 scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Iceriver AL3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Iceriver AL3 and IceRiver KS0?
The Iceriver AL3 runs at 233.3 J/TH while the IceRiver KS0 runs at 650.0 J/TH — a difference of 416.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 64% better efficacité (233 vs 650 J/TH).