Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus vs Iceriver AL3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus | Specification | Iceriver AL3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 15.0 TH/s |
| 480 W | Consommation électrique | 3,500 W |
| 480.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 233.3 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 2.2 kg | Weight | 16.0 kg |
| 1,638 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,942 BTU/hr |
| 34/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithme | Blake3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus
Iceriver AL3
Based on BTC price of $78,245 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Iceriver AL3, which leads on 5 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 1400% more hashrate (1.0 vs 15.0 TH/s) in the Iceriver AL3's favour. The Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus holds the edge in consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus and Iceriver AL3 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Iceriver AL3 1400% more hashrate (1.0 vs 15.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus 86% better power draw (480 vs 3,500 W)
- Iceriver AL3 51% better efficacité (480 vs 233 J/TH)
- Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus 86% better weight (2.2 vs 16.0 kg)
- Iceriver AL3 629% more heat output (1,638 vs 11,942 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver AL3 6% more score de minage domestique (34.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus | Metric | Iceriver AL3 |
|---|---|---|
| $129 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,550 |
| -$1.12 | Daily net profit | -$7.86 |
| -$536 | Net after 1 year | -$4,419 |
| -$944 | Net after 2 years | -$7,288 |
| -$1,351 | Net after 3 years | -$10,157 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver AL3Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver AL3233.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus or Iceriver AL3 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus is more profitable at $-1.12/day compared to $-7.86/day for the Iceriver AL3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus or Iceriver AL3?
The Iceriver AL3 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus or the Iceriver AL3?
The Iceriver AL3 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 34/100 for the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus and Iceriver AL3 on J/TH?
The Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus runs at 480.0 J/TH while the Iceriver AL3 runs at 233.3 J/TH — a difference of 246.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 51% better efficacité (480 vs 233 J/TH).