Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus vs Goldshell E-AL1M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus | Specification | Goldshell E-AL1M |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 4.4 TH/s |
| 480 W | Consommation électrique | 1,800 W |
| 480.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 409.1 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 2.2 kg | Weight | — |
| 1,638 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,142 BTU/hr |
| 34/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithme | Blake3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus
Goldshell E-AL1M
Based on BTC price of $78,235 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell E-AL1M comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 5 (efficacité, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 340% more hashrate (1.0 vs 4.4 TH/s). The Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and rapport qualité-prix. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus and Goldshell E-AL1M diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell E-AL1M 340% more hashrate (1.0 vs 4.4 TH/s)
- Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus 73% better power draw (480 vs 1,800 W)
- Goldshell E-AL1M 15% better efficacité (480 vs 409 J/TH)
- Goldshell E-AL1M 275% more heat output (1,638 vs 6,142 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus 21% more score de minage domestique (34.0 vs 28.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus | Metric | Goldshell E-AL1M |
|---|---|---|
| $129 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $799 |
| -$1.12 | Daily net profit | -$4.16 |
| -$536 | Net after 1 year | -$2,318 |
| -$944 | Net after 2 years | -$3,837 |
| -$1,351 | Net after 3 years | -$5,356 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AL-BOX II PlusScore: 34/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell E-AL1M409.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus vs Goldshell E-AL1M: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus is more profitable at $-1.12/day compared to $-4.16/day for the Goldshell E-AL1M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus or the Goldshell E-AL1M better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus or the Goldshell E-AL1M?
The Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus scores 34/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Goldshell E-AL1M). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus vs Goldshell E-AL1M: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus runs at 480.0 J/TH while the Goldshell E-AL1M runs at 409.1 J/TH — a difference of 70.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 15% better efficacité (480 vs 409 J/TH).