Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell E-AL1M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max II | Specification | Goldshell E-AL1M |
|---|---|---|
| 540.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 4.4 TH/s |
| 3,200 W | Consommation électrique | 1,800 W |
| 5,925,925.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 409.1 J/TH |
| 85 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 12.5 kg | Weight | — |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,142 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Blake3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max II
Goldshell E-AL1M
Based on BTC price of $78,203 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Goldshell E-AL1M l'emporte sur 4 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better efficacité (5,925,926 vs 409 J/TH). That said, the Goldshell AE Max II isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell E-AL1M actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell E-AL1M 814715% more hashrate (0.0 vs 4.4 TH/s)
- Goldshell E-AL1M 44% better power draw (3,200 vs 1,800 W)
- Goldshell E-AL1M 100% better efficacité (5,925,926 vs 409 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Max II 78% more heat output (10,918 vs 6,142 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Max II 4% more score de minage domestique (29.0 vs 28.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AE Max II | Metric | Goldshell E-AL1M |
|---|---|---|
| $1,050 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $799 |
| -$7.68 | Daily net profit | -$4.16 |
| -$3,853 | Net after 1 year | -$2,318 |
| -$6,656 | Net after 2 years | -$3,837 |
| -$9,460 | Net after 3 years | -$5,356 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE Max IIScore: 29/100. 85 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell E-AL1M409.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell E-AL1M: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell E-AL1M is more profitable at $-4.16/day compared to $-7.68/day for the Goldshell AE Max II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE Max II or Goldshell E-AL1M?
The Goldshell AE Max II is quieter at 85 dB compared to the Goldshell E-AL1M at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell E-AL1M: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell AE Max II scores 29/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Goldshell E-AL1M). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell E-AL1M?
The Goldshell AE Max II runs at 5,925,925.9 J/TH while the Goldshell E-AL1M runs at 409.1 J/TH — a difference of 5,925,516.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (5,925,926 vs 409 J/TH).