Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell E-AL1M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max | Specification | Goldshell E-AL1M |
|---|---|---|
| 360.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 4.4 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Consommation électrique | 1,800 W |
| 9,166,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 409.1 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | — |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,142 BTU/hr |
| 50/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Blake3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max
Goldshell E-AL1M
Based on BTC price of $78,203 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Goldshell E-AL1M l'emporte sur 4 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 100% better efficacité (9,166,667 vs 409 J/TH) in the Goldshell E-AL1M's favour. The Goldshell AE Max claws back ground on score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell E-AL1M actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell E-AL1M 1222122% more hashrate (0.0 vs 4.4 TH/s)
- Goldshell E-AL1M 45% better power draw (3,300 vs 1,800 W)
- Goldshell E-AL1M 100% better efficacité (9,166,667 vs 409 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Max 83% more heat output (11,260 vs 6,142 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Max 79% more score de minage domestique (50.0 vs 28.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE Max | Metric | Goldshell E-AL1M |
|---|---|---|
| $870 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $799 |
| -$7.92 | Daily net profit | -$4.16 |
| -$3,761 | Net after 1 year | -$2,318 |
| -$6,652 | Net after 2 years | -$3,837 |
| -$9,542 | Net after 3 years | -$5,356 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE MaxScore: 50/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell E-AL1M409.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell E-AL1M: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell E-AL1M is more profitable at $-4.16/day compared to $-7.92/day for the Goldshell AE Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE Max or the Goldshell E-AL1M better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell AE Max is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Goldshell E-AL1M at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell E-AL1M: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell AE Max scores 50/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Goldshell E-AL1M). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell E-AL1M?
The Goldshell AE Max runs at 9,166,666.7 J/TH while the Goldshell E-AL1M runs at 409.1 J/TH — a difference of 9,166,257.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (9,166,667 vs 409 J/TH).