Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus vs colengine P2
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus | Specification | colengine P2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 38.0 GH/s |
| 480 W | Consommation électrique | 1,458 W |
| 480.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 38,368.4 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 80 dB |
| 2.2 kg | Weight | 14.8 kg |
| 1,638 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,975 BTU/hr |
| 34/100 | Home Mining Score | 38/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithme | Blake3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | colengine |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus
colengine P2
Based on BTC price of $78,163 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus edges it: 4 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 99% better efficacité (480 vs 38,368 J/TH) in the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus's favour. The colengine P2 claws back ground on score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus and colengine P2 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus 2532% more hashrate (1.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus 67% better power draw (480 vs 1,458 W)
- Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus 99% better efficacité (480 vs 38,368 J/TH)
- Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus 85% better weight (2.2 vs 14.8 kg)
- colengine P2 204% more heat output (1,638 vs 4,975 BTU/hr)
- colengine P2 12% more score de minage domestique (34.0 vs 38.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus | Metric | colengine P2 |
|---|---|---|
| $129 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,290 |
| -$1.12 | Daily net profit | -$3.50 |
| -$536 | Net after 1 year | -$2,567 |
| -$944 | Net after 2 years | -$3,843 |
| -$1,351 | Net after 3 years | -$5,120 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
colengine P2Score: 38/100. 80 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus480.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus vs colengine P2: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus is more profitable at $-1.12/day compared to $-3.50/day for the colengine P2. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus vs colengine P2: which runs at a lower noise level?
The colengine P2 is quieter at 80 dB compared to the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus or the colengine P2?
The colengine P2 scores 38/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 34/100 for the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus and colengine P2?
The Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus runs at 480.0 J/TH while the colengine P2 runs at 38,368.4 J/TH — a difference of 37,888.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 99% better efficacité (480 vs 38,368 J/TH).