Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro vs colengine P2
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro | Specification | colengine P2 |
|---|---|---|
| 16.6 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 38.0 GH/s |
| 3,730 W | Consommation électrique | 1,458 W |
| 224.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 38,368.4 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 80 dB |
| 13.6 kg | Weight | 14.8 kg |
| 12,727 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,975 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 38/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithme | Blake3 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | colengine |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro
colengine P2
Based on BTC price of $78,235 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro edges it: 4 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 43584% more hashrate (16.6 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro's favour. The colengine P2 holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro and colengine P2 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro 43584% more hashrate (16.6 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- colengine P2 61% better power draw (3,730 vs 1,458 W)
- Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro 99% better efficacité (225 vs 38,368 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro 6% better noise (75.0 vs 80.0 dB)
- Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro 8% better weight (13.6 vs 14.8 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro 156% more heat output (12,727 vs 4,975 BTU/hr)
- colengine P2 27% more score de minage domestique (30.0 vs 38.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro | Metric | colengine P2 |
|---|---|---|
| $9,100 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,290 |
| -$8.35 | Daily net profit | -$3.50 |
| -$12,149 | Net after 1 year | -$2,567 |
| -$15,199 | Net after 2 years | -$3,843 |
| -$18,248 | Net after 3 years | -$5,120 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
colengine P2Score: 38/100. 80 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro224.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro or colengine P2 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the colengine P2 is more profitable at $-3.50/day compared to $-8.35/day for the Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro vs colengine P2: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro is quieter at 75 dB compared to the colengine P2 at 80 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro or the colengine P2?
The colengine P2 scores 38/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro vs colengine P2: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro runs at 224.7 J/TH while the colengine P2 runs at 38,368.4 J/TH — a difference of 38,143.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 99% better efficacité (225 vs 38,368 J/TH).