Goldshell AL BOX III vs Iceriver AL3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AL BOX III | Specification | Iceriver AL3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1.3 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 15.0 TH/s |
| 600 W | Consommation électrique | 3,500 W |
| 480.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 233.3 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 2.2 kg | Weight | 16.0 kg |
| 2,047 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,942 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithme | Blake3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AL BOX III
Iceriver AL3
Based on BTC price of $78,185 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Iceriver AL3 edges it: 5 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 1100% more hashrate (1.3 vs 15.0 TH/s). That said, the Goldshell AL BOX III isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AL BOX III and Iceriver AL3 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Iceriver AL3 1100% more hashrate (1.3 vs 15.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell AL BOX III 83% better power draw (600 vs 3,500 W)
- Iceriver AL3 51% better efficacité (480 vs 233 J/TH)
- Goldshell AL BOX III 86% better weight (2.2 vs 16.0 kg)
- Iceriver AL3 483% more heat output (2,047 vs 11,942 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver AL3 20% more score de minage domestique (30.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AL BOX III | Metric | Iceriver AL3 |
|---|---|---|
| $139 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,550 |
| -$1.40 | Daily net profit | -$7.86 |
| -$648 | Net after 1 year | -$4,419 |
| -$1,157 | Net after 2 years | -$7,288 |
| -$1,667 | Net after 3 years | -$10,157 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver AL3Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver AL3233.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AL BOX III vs Iceriver AL3: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AL BOX III is more profitable at $-1.40/day compared to $-7.86/day for the Iceriver AL3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AL BOX III or Iceriver AL3?
The Iceriver AL3 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Goldshell AL BOX III at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AL BOX III or the Iceriver AL3?
The Iceriver AL3 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Goldshell AL BOX III). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AL BOX III and Iceriver AL3 on J/TH?
The Goldshell AL BOX III runs at 480.0 J/TH while the Iceriver AL3 runs at 233.3 J/TH — a difference of 246.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 51% better efficacité (480 vs 233 J/TH).