Goldshell AL BOX III vs colengine P2
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AL BOX III | Specification | colengine P2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1.3 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 38.0 GH/s |
| 600 W | Consommation électrique | 1,458 W |
| 480.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 38,368.4 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 80 dB |
| 2.2 kg | Weight | 14.8 kg |
| 2,047 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,975 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 38/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithme | Blake3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | colengine |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AL BOX III
colengine P2
Based on BTC price of $78,235 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Goldshell AL BOX III l'emporte sur 4 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 99% better efficacité (480 vs 38,368 J/TH). The colengine P2 claws back ground on score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AL BOX III and colengine P2 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell AL BOX III 3189% more hashrate (1.3 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell AL BOX III 59% better power draw (600 vs 1,458 W)
- Goldshell AL BOX III 99% better efficacité (480 vs 38,368 J/TH)
- Goldshell AL BOX III 85% better weight (2.2 vs 14.8 kg)
- colengine P2 143% more heat output (2,047 vs 4,975 BTU/hr)
- colengine P2 27% more score de minage domestique (30.0 vs 38.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AL BOX III | Metric | colengine P2 |
|---|---|---|
| $139 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,290 |
| -$1.39 | Daily net profit | -$3.50 |
| -$648 | Net after 1 year | -$2,567 |
| -$1,157 | Net after 2 years | -$3,843 |
| -$1,667 | Net after 3 years | -$5,120 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
colengine P2Score: 38/100. 80 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell AL BOX III480.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AL BOX III or colengine P2 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AL BOX III is more profitable at $-1.39/day compared to $-3.50/day for the colengine P2. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AL BOX III or the colengine P2 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The colengine P2 is quieter at 80 dB compared to the Goldshell AL BOX III at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell AL BOX III vs colengine P2: which fits a residential setup better?
The colengine P2 scores 38/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Goldshell AL BOX III). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AL BOX III and colengine P2 on J/TH?
The Goldshell AL BOX III runs at 480.0 J/TH while the colengine P2 runs at 38,368.4 J/TH — a difference of 37,888.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 99% better efficacité (480 vs 38,368 J/TH).