Goldshell AL Card vs Iceriver ALPH AL0
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AL Card | Specification | Iceriver ALPH AL0 |
|---|---|---|
| 120.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 400.0 GH/s |
| 65 W | Consommation électrique | 100 W |
| 541.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 250.0 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | 50 dB |
| 3.3 kg | Weight | 2.5 kg |
| 222 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 341 BTU/hr |
| 71/100 | Home Mining Score | 64/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithme | Blake3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AL Card
Iceriver ALPH AL0
Based on BTC price of $78,236 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Iceriver ALPH AL0 l'emporte sur 3 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 233% more hashrate (0.1 vs 0.4 TH/s) in the Iceriver ALPH AL0's favour. The Goldshell AL Card claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AL Card and Iceriver ALPH AL0 sit on each measurable spec:
- Iceriver ALPH AL0 233% more hashrate (0.1 vs 0.4 TH/s)
- Goldshell AL Card 35% better power draw (65.0 vs 100.0 W)
- Iceriver ALPH AL0 54% better efficacité (542 vs 250 J/TH)
- Goldshell AL Card 30% better noise (35.0 vs 50.0 dB)
- Iceriver ALPH AL0 23% better weight (3.3 vs 2.5 kg)
- Iceriver ALPH AL0 54% more heat output (222 vs 341 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AL Card 11% more score de minage domestique (71.0 vs 64.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AL Card | Metric | Iceriver ALPH AL0 |
|---|---|---|
| $111 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $178 |
| -$0.15 | Daily net profit | -$0.23 |
| -$166 | Net after 1 year | -$260 |
| -$222 | Net after 2 years | -$343 |
| -$277 | Net after 3 years | -$425 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AL CardScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver ALPH AL0250.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AL Card or Iceriver ALPH AL0 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AL Card is more profitable at $-0.15/day compared to $-0.23/day for the Iceriver ALPH AL0. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AL Card or the Iceriver ALPH AL0 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell AL Card is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Iceriver ALPH AL0 at 50 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell AL Card vs Iceriver ALPH AL0: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell AL Card scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 64/100 for the Iceriver ALPH AL0). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AL Card vs Iceriver ALPH AL0: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AL Card runs at 541.7 J/TH while the Iceriver ALPH AL0 runs at 250.0 J/TH — a difference of 291.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 54% better efficacité (542 vs 250 J/TH).