Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell AL Card
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max II | Specification | Goldshell AL Card |
|---|---|---|
| 540.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 120.0 GH/s |
| 3,200 W | Consommation électrique | 65 W |
| 5,925,925.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 541.7 J/TH |
| 85 dB | Niveau de bruit | 35 dB |
| 12.5 kg | Weight | 3.3 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 222 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 71/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Blake3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max II
Goldshell AL Card
Based on BTC price of $78,163 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Goldshell AL Card l'emporte sur 6 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 100% better efficacité (5,925,926 vs 542 J/TH). The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell AL Card diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell AL Card 22122% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.1 TH/s)
- Goldshell AL Card 98% better power draw (3,200.0 vs 65.0 W)
- Goldshell AL Card 100% better efficacité (5,925,926 vs 542 J/TH)
- Goldshell AL Card 59% better noise (85.0 vs 35.0 dB)
- Goldshell AL Card 74% better weight (12.5 vs 3.3 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max II 4823% more heat output (10,918 vs 222 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AL Card 145% more score de minage domestique (29.0 vs 71.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AE Max II | Metric | Goldshell AL Card |
|---|---|---|
| $1,050 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $111 |
| -$7.68 | Daily net profit | -$0.15 |
| -$3,853 | Net after 1 year | -$166 |
| -$6,656 | Net after 2 years | -$222 |
| -$9,460 | Net after 3 years | -$277 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AL CardScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell AL Card541.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AE Max II or Goldshell AL Card more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AL Card is more profitable at $-0.15/day compared to $-7.68/day for the Goldshell AE Max II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE Max II or the Goldshell AL Card better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell AL Card is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell AE Max II at 85 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE Max II or the Goldshell AL Card?
The Goldshell AL Card scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 29/100 for the Goldshell AE Max II). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell AL Card on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE Max II runs at 5,925,925.9 J/TH while the Goldshell AL Card runs at 541.7 J/TH — a difference of 5,925,384.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (5,925,926 vs 542 J/TH).