Goldshell AL MAX vs Iceriver AL3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AL MAX | Specification | Iceriver AL3 |
|---|---|---|
| 8.3 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 15.0 TH/s |
| 3,350 W | Consommation électrique | 3,500 W |
| 403.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 233.3 J/TH |
| 45 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | 16.0 kg |
| 11,430 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,942 BTU/hr |
| 50/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithme | Blake3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AL MAX
Iceriver AL3
Based on BTC price of $78,245 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Iceriver AL3 l'emporte sur 3 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 81% more hashrate (8.3 vs 15.0 TH/s). The Goldshell AL MAX holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AL MAX and Iceriver AL3 sit on each measurable spec:
- Iceriver AL3 81% more hashrate (8.3 vs 15.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell AL MAX 4% better power draw (3,350 vs 3,500 W)
- Iceriver AL3 42% better efficacité (404 vs 233 J/TH)
- Goldshell AL MAX 40% better noise (45.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Goldshell AL MAX 16% better weight (13.5 vs 16.0 kg)
- Iceriver AL3 4% more heat output (11,430 vs 11,942 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AL MAX 39% more score de minage domestique (50.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AL MAX | Metric | Iceriver AL3 |
|---|---|---|
| $2,370 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,550 |
| -$7.74 | Daily net profit | -$7.86 |
| -$5,196 | Net after 1 year | -$4,419 |
| -$8,021 | Net after 2 years | -$7,288 |
| -$10,847 | Net after 3 years | -$10,157 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AL MAXScore: 50/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver AL3233.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AL MAX vs Iceriver AL3: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AL MAX is more profitable at $-7.74/day compared to $-7.86/day for the Iceriver AL3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AL MAX vs Iceriver AL3: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AL MAX is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Iceriver AL3 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AL MAX or the Iceriver AL3?
The Goldshell AL MAX scores 50/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Iceriver AL3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AL MAX vs Iceriver AL3: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AL MAX runs at 403.6 J/TH while the Iceriver AL3 runs at 233.3 J/TH — a difference of 170.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 42% better efficacité (404 vs 233 J/TH).