Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite vs Iceriver RXD RX0
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite | Specification | Iceriver RXD RX0 |
|---|---|---|
| 300.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 260.0 GH/s |
| 500 W | Consommation électrique | 100 W |
| 1,666,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 384.6 J/TH |
| 45 dB | Niveau de bruit | 10 dB |
| 4.0 kg | Weight | 2.5 kg |
| 1,706 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 341 BTU/hr |
| 62/100 | Home Mining Score | 71/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Sha512256d |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite
Iceriver RXD RX0
Based on BTC price of $78,244 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Iceriver RXD RX0 edges it: 6 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 100% better efficacité (1,666,667 vs 385 J/TH) in the Iceriver RXD RX0's favour. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite and Iceriver RXD RX0 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Iceriver RXD RX0 86567% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.3 TH/s)
- Iceriver RXD RX0 80% better power draw (500 vs 100 W)
- Iceriver RXD RX0 100% better efficacité (1,666,667 vs 385 J/TH)
- Iceriver RXD RX0 78% better noise (45.0 vs 10.0 dB)
- Iceriver RXD RX0 38% better weight (4.0 vs 2.5 kg)
- Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite 400% more heat output (1,706 vs 341 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver RXD RX0 15% more score de minage domestique (62.0 vs 71.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite | Metric | Iceriver RXD RX0 |
|---|---|---|
| $979 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $395 |
| -$1.20 | Daily net profit | -$0.23 |
| -$1,417 | Net after 1 year | -$479 |
| -$1,855 | Net after 2 years | -$563 |
| -$2,293 | Net after 3 years | -$648 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver RXD RX0Score: 71/100. 10 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver RXD RX0384.6 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite vs Iceriver RXD RX0: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver RXD RX0 is more profitable at $-0.23/day compared to $-1.20/day for the Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite vs Iceriver RXD RX0: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Iceriver RXD RX0 is quieter at 10 dB compared to the Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite at 45 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite or the Iceriver RXD RX0?
The Iceriver RXD RX0 scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 62/100 for the Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite and Iceriver RXD RX0 on J/TH?
The Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite runs at 1,666,666.7 J/TH while the Iceriver RXD RX0 runs at 384.6 J/TH — a difference of 1,666,282.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (1,666,667 vs 385 J/TH).