Iceriver AL3 vs Iceriver RXD RX0
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver AL3 | Specification | Iceriver RXD RX0 |
|---|---|---|
| 15.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 260.0 GH/s |
| 3,500 W | Consommation électrique | 100 W |
| 233.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 384.6 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 10 dB |
| 16.0 kg | Weight | 2.5 kg |
| 11,942 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 341 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 71/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithme | Sha512256d |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver AL3
Iceriver RXD RX0
Based on BTC price of $78,230 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Iceriver AL3 comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 5669% more hashrate (15.0 vs 0.3 TH/s). That said, the Iceriver RXD RX0 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Iceriver AL3 and Iceriver RXD RX0 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Iceriver AL3 5669% more hashrate (15.0 vs 0.3 TH/s)
- Iceriver RXD RX0 97% better power draw (3,500 vs 100 W)
- Iceriver AL3 39% better efficacité (233 vs 385 J/TH)
- Iceriver RXD RX0 87% better noise (75.0 vs 10.0 dB)
- Iceriver RXD RX0 84% better weight (16.0 vs 2.5 kg)
- Iceriver AL3 3400% more heat output (11,942 vs 341 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver RXD RX0 97% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 71.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Iceriver AL3 | Metric | Iceriver RXD RX0 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,550 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $395 |
| -$7.86 | Daily net profit | -$0.23 |
| -$4,419 | Net after 1 year | -$479 |
| -$7,288 | Net after 2 years | -$563 |
| -$10,157 | Net after 3 years | -$648 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver RXD RX0Score: 71/100. 10 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver AL3233.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Iceriver AL3 or Iceriver RXD RX0 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver RXD RX0 is more profitable at $-0.23/day compared to $-7.86/day for the Iceriver AL3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Iceriver AL3 vs Iceriver RXD RX0: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Iceriver RXD RX0 is quieter at 10 dB compared to the Iceriver AL3 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Iceriver AL3 or Iceriver RXD RX0?
The Iceriver RXD RX0 scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Iceriver AL3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Iceriver AL3 and Iceriver RXD RX0 on J/TH?
The Iceriver AL3 runs at 233.3 J/TH while the Iceriver RXD RX0 runs at 384.6 J/TH — a difference of 151.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 39% better efficacité (233 vs 385 J/TH).