Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) vs Iceriver KS1
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) | Specification | Iceriver KS1 |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.0 TH/s |
| 3,580 W | Consommation électrique | 600 W |
| 1,790,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 600.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 15.0 kg | Weight | 14.9 kg |
| 12,215 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,047 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 44/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s)
Iceriver KS1
Based on BTC price of $78,195 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Iceriver KS1 edges it: 5 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 100% better efficacité (1,790,000 vs 600 J/TH) in the Iceriver KS1's favour. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) and Iceriver KS1 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Iceriver KS1 49900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 1.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver KS1 83% better power draw (3,580 vs 600 W)
- Iceriver KS1 100% better efficacité (1,790,000 vs 600 J/TH)
- Iceriver KS1 1% better weight (15.0 vs 14.9 kg)
- Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) 497% more heat output (12,215 vs 2,047 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KS1 47% more score de minage domestique (30.0 vs 44.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) | Metric | Iceriver KS1 |
|---|---|---|
| $5,390 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $199 |
| -$8.59 | Daily net profit | -$1.40 |
| -$8,526 | Net after 1 year | -$711 |
| -$11,662 | Net after 2 years | -$1,224 |
| -$14,798 | Net after 3 years | -$1,736 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KS1Score: 44/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KS1600.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) vs Iceriver KS1: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KS1 is more profitable at $-1.40/day compared to $-8.59/day for the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) or the Iceriver KS1 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) or the Iceriver KS1?
The Iceriver KS1 scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) and Iceriver KS1?
The Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) runs at 1,790,000.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KS1 runs at 600.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,789,400.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (1,790,000 vs 600 J/TH).