Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) vs Goldshell CK6
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) | Specification | Goldshell CK6 |
|---|---|---|
| 1.1 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 19.3 TH/s |
| 1,580 W | Consommation électrique | 3,300 W |
| 1,398.2 J/TH | Efficiency | 171.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 6,100.0 kg | Weight | 8,500.0 kg |
| 5,391 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,260 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithme | Eaglesong |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh)
Goldshell CK6
Based on BTC price of $78,223 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Goldshell CK6 l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 1608% more hashrate (1.1 vs 19.3 TH/s). That said, the Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) and Goldshell CK6 sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell CK6 1608% more hashrate (1.1 vs 19.3 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) 52% better power draw (1,580 vs 3,300 W)
- Goldshell CK6 88% better efficacité (1,398 vs 171 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) 28% better weight (6,100 vs 8,500 kg)
- Goldshell CK6 109% more heat output (5,391 vs 11,260 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) 27% more score de minage domestique (28.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) | Metric | Goldshell CK6 |
|---|---|---|
| $925 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $799 |
| -$3.75 | Daily net profit | -$7.23 |
| -$2,294 | Net after 1 year | -$3,436 |
| -$3,663 | Net after 2 years | -$6,073 |
| -$5,033 | Net after 3 years | -$8,711 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh)Score: 28/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell CK6171.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) or Goldshell CK6 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) is more profitable at $-3.75/day compared to $-7.23/day for the Goldshell CK6. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) vs Goldshell CK6: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) vs Goldshell CK6: which fits a residential setup better?
The Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) scores 28/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell CK6). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) and Goldshell CK6?
The Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) runs at 1,398.2 J/TH while the Goldshell CK6 runs at 171.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,227.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 88% better efficacité (1,398 vs 171 J/TH).