Antminer E9 Pro vs Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer E9 Pro | Specification | Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) |
|---|---|---|
| 3,680.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.1 TH/s |
| 2,200 W | Consommation électrique | 1,580 W |
| 597,826.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,398.2 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 14.2 kg | Weight | 6,100.0 kg |
| 7,506 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 5,391 BTU/hr |
| 40/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | Eaglesong |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer E9 Pro
Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh)
Based on BTC price of $77,900 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) edges it: 4 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better efficacité (597,826 vs 1,398 J/TH). The Antminer E9 Pro claws back ground on score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer E9 Pro and Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) 30607% more hashrate (0.0 vs 1.1 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) 28% better power draw (2,200 vs 1,580 W)
- Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) 100% better efficacité (597,826 vs 1,398 J/TH)
- Antminer E9 Pro 100% better weight (14.2 vs 6,100.0 kg)
- Antminer E9 Pro 39% more heat output (7,506 vs 5,391 BTU/hr)
- Antminer E9 Pro 43% more score de minage domestique (40.0 vs 28.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer E9 Pro | Metric | Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) |
|---|---|---|
| $3,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $925 |
| -$5.28 | Daily net profit | -$3.75 |
| -$4,927 | Net after 1 year | -$2,294 |
| -$6,854 | Net after 2 years | -$3,664 |
| -$8,781 | Net after 3 years | -$5,033 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer E9 ProScore: 40/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh)1,398.2 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer E9 Pro vs Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) is more profitable at $-3.75/day compared to $-5.28/day for the Antminer E9 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer E9 Pro or Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh)?
The Antminer E9 Pro is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer E9 Pro or the Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh)?
The Antminer E9 Pro scores 40/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer E9 Pro vs Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer E9 Pro runs at 597,826.1 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) runs at 1,398.2 J/TH — a difference of 596,427.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (597,826 vs 1,398 J/TH).