Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) vs Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) | Specification | Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE |
|---|---|---|
| 8.3 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 2.0 TH/s |
| 3,188 W | Consommation électrique | 500 W |
| 384.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 250.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 45 dB |
| — | Weight | 5.0 kg |
| 10,878 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,706 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 62/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th)
Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE
Based on BTC price of $78,210 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE l'emporte sur 5 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 84% better power draw (3,188 vs 500 W). The Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) holds the edge in hashrate. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) and Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) 315% more hashrate (8.3 vs 2.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE 84% better power draw (3,188 vs 500 W)
- Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE 35% better efficacité (384 vs 250 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) 538% more heat output (10,878 vs 1,706 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE 182% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 62.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) | Metric | Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE |
|---|---|---|
| $3,850 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $458 |
| -$7.35 | Daily net profit | -$1.13 |
| -$6,534 | Net after 1 year | -$870 |
| -$9,217 | Net after 2 years | -$1,281 |
| -$11,901 | Net after 3 years | -$1,693 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KAS KS2 LITEScore: 62/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE250.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) or Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE is more profitable at $-1.13/day compared to $-7.35/day for the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) vs Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) or the Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE?
The Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE scores 62/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) vs Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) runs at 384.1 J/TH while the Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE runs at 250.0 J/TH — a difference of 134.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 35% better efficacité (384 vs 250 J/TH).