Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh)
Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) vs Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) | Specification | Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) |
|---|---|---|
| 580.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 17.0 GH/s |
| 942 W | Consommation électrique | 3,570 W |
| 1,624,137.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 210,000.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 4,400.0 kg | Weight | 13.5 kg |
| 3,214 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 12,181 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh)
Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh)
Based on BTC price of $78,223 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) l'emporte sur 4 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 2831% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh)'s favour. That said, the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) and Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) 2831% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) 74% better power draw (942 vs 3,570 W)
- Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) 87% better efficacité (1,624,138 vs 210,000 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) 100% better weight (4,400.0 vs 13.5 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) 279% more heat output (3,214 vs 12,181 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) 3% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) | Metric | Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) |
|---|---|---|
| $1,190 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $3,380 |
| -$2.26 | Daily net profit | -$8.57 |
| -$2,015 | Net after 1 year | -$6,507 |
| -$2,840 | Net after 2 years | -$9,634 |
| -$3,666 | Net after 3 years | -$12,761 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh)Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh)210,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) vs Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) is more profitable at $-2.26/day compared to $-8.57/day for the Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) or the Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) or the Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh)?
The Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) and Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) runs at 1,624,137.9 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) runs at 210,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,414,137.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 87% better efficacité (1,624,138 vs 210,000 J/TH).