Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh)
Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) vs Goldshell X5S
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) | Specification | Goldshell X5S |
|---|---|---|
| 580.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.4 GH/s |
| 942 W | Consommation électrique | 1,850 W |
| 1,624,137.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,360,294.1 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 4,400.0 kg | Weight | 5,200.0 kg |
| 3,214 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,312 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh)
Goldshell X5S
Based on BTC price of $78,223 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Scored side by side, the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) and Goldshell X5S trade blows evenly. Neither pulls ahead decisively, so the deciding factor is which spec matters most to your setup — the panels above lay that out.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) and Goldshell X5S actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell X5S 134% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) 49% better power draw (942 vs 1,850 W)
- Goldshell X5S 16% better efficacité (1,624,138 vs 1,360,294 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) 15% better weight (4,400 vs 5,200 kg)
- Goldshell X5S 96% more heat output (3,214 vs 6,312 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) 11% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 28.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) | Metric | Goldshell X5S |
|---|---|---|
| $1,190 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$2.26 | Daily net profit | -$4.44 |
| -$2,015 | Net after 1 year | -$1,621 |
| -$2,840 | Net after 2 years | -$3,241 |
| -$3,666 | Net after 3 years | -$4,862 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh)Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell X5S1,360,294.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) or Goldshell X5S more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) is more profitable at $-2.26/day compared to $-4.44/day for the Goldshell X5S. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) or the Goldshell X5S better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) vs Goldshell X5S: which fits a residential setup better?
The Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Goldshell X5S). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) and Goldshell X5S?
The Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) runs at 1,624,137.9 J/TH while the Goldshell X5S runs at 1,360,294.1 J/TH — a difference of 263,843.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 16% better efficacité (1,624,138 vs 1,360,294 J/TH).