Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell X5S
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Specification | Goldshell X5S |
|---|---|---|
| 54.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.4 GH/s |
| 530 W | Consommation électrique | 1,850 W |
| 9,814,814.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,360,294.1 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 3.0 kg | Weight | 5,200.0 kg |
| 1,808 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,312 BTU/hr |
| 65/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX II
Goldshell X5S
Based on BTC price of $78,217 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell X5S comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 5 (efficacité, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 2419% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). That said, the Goldshell AE-BOX II isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell X5S sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell X5S 2419% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 71% better power draw (530 vs 1,850 W)
- Goldshell X5S 86% better efficacité (9,814,815 vs 1,360,294 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 100% better weight (3.0 vs 5,200.0 kg)
- Goldshell X5S 249% more heat output (1,808 vs 6,312 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 132% more score de minage domestique (65.0 vs 28.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Metric | Goldshell X5S |
|---|---|---|
| $120 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$1.27 | Daily net profit | -$4.44 |
| -$584 | Net after 1 year | -$1,621 |
| -$1,049 | Net after 2 years | -$3,241 |
| -$1,513 | Net after 3 years | -$4,862 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOX IIScore: 65/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell X5S1,360,294.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AE-BOX II or Goldshell X5S more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE-BOX II is more profitable at $-1.27/day compared to $-4.44/day for the Goldshell X5S. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE-BOX II or Goldshell X5S?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell X5S at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE-BOX II or the Goldshell X5S?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Goldshell X5S). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell X5S on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II runs at 9,814,814.8 J/TH while the Goldshell X5S runs at 1,360,294.1 J/TH — a difference of 8,454,520.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 86% better efficacité (9,814,815 vs 1,360,294 J/TH).