Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell X5S
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max II | Specification | Goldshell X5S |
|---|---|---|
| 540.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.4 GH/s |
| 3,200 W | Consommation électrique | 1,850 W |
| 5,925,925.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,360,294.1 J/TH |
| 85 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 12.5 kg | Weight | 5,200.0 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,312 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max II
Goldshell X5S
Based on BTC price of $78,237 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell X5S, which leads on 2 of 4 weighted factors (efficacité, consommation électrique). The standout gap is 77% better efficacité (5,925,926 vs 1,360,294 J/TH) in the Goldshell X5S's favour. The Goldshell AE Max II claws back ground on score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell X5S diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell X5S 152% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell X5S 42% better power draw (3,200 vs 1,850 W)
- Goldshell X5S 77% better efficacité (5,925,926 vs 1,360,294 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Max II 100% better weight (12.5 vs 5,200.0 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max II 73% more heat output (10,918 vs 6,312 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Max II 4% more score de minage domestique (29.0 vs 28.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE Max II | Metric | Goldshell X5S |
|---|---|---|
| $1,050 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$7.68 | Daily net profit | -$4.44 |
| -$3,853 | Net after 1 year | -$1,621 |
| -$6,656 | Net after 2 years | -$3,241 |
| -$9,460 | Net after 3 years | -$4,862 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE Max IIScore: 29/100. 85 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell X5S1,360,294.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE Max II or the Goldshell X5S?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell X5S is more profitable at $-4.44/day compared to $-7.68/day for the Goldshell AE Max II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell X5S: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AE Max II is quieter at 85 dB compared to the Goldshell X5S at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE Max II or Goldshell X5S?
The Goldshell AE Max II scores 29/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Goldshell X5S). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell X5S?
The Goldshell AE Max II runs at 5,925,925.9 J/TH while the Goldshell X5S runs at 1,360,294.1 J/TH — a difference of 4,565,631.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 77% better efficacité (5,925,926 vs 1,360,294 J/TH).