Bitmain Antminer L3+ (600Mh) vs Goldshell Mini Doge II
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer L3+ (600Mh) | Specification | Goldshell Mini Doge II |
|---|---|---|
| 600.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 420.0 MH/s |
| 850 W | Consommation électrique | 400 W |
| 1,416,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 952,381.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 35 dB |
| 4,400.0 kg | Weight | 2.3 kg |
| 2,900 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,365 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 69/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer L3+ (600Mh)
Goldshell Mini Doge II
Based on BTC price of $78,139 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell Mini Doge II comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 5 (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 53% better power draw (850 vs 400 W). The Bitmain Antminer L3+ (600Mh) claws back ground on rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer L3+ (600Mh) and Goldshell Mini Doge II diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer L3+ (600Mh) 43% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell Mini Doge II 53% better power draw (850 vs 400 W)
- Goldshell Mini Doge II 33% better efficacité (1,416,667 vs 952,381 J/TH)
- Goldshell Mini Doge II 100% better weight (4,400.0 vs 2.3 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer L3+ (600Mh) 113% more heat output (2,900 vs 1,365 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell Mini Doge II 146% more score de minage domestique (28.0 vs 69.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer L3+ (600Mh) | Metric | Goldshell Mini Doge II |
|---|---|---|
| $165 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $258 |
| -$2.04 | Daily net profit | -$0.96 |
| -$910 | Net after 1 year | -$608 |
| -$1,654 | Net after 2 years | -$959 |
| -$2,399 | Net after 3 years | -$1,309 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell Mini Doge IIScore: 69/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell Mini Doge II952,381.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (600Mh) or Goldshell Mini Doge II more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell Mini Doge II is more profitable at $-0.96/day compared to $-2.04/day for the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (600Mh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (600Mh) or the Goldshell Mini Doge II better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell Mini Doge II is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (600Mh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (600Mh) or the Goldshell Mini Doge II?
The Goldshell Mini Doge II scores 69/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (600Mh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (600Mh) and Goldshell Mini Doge II on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer L3+ (600Mh) runs at 1,416,666.7 J/TH while the Goldshell Mini Doge II runs at 952,381.0 J/TH — a difference of 464,285.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 33% better efficacité (1,416,667 vs 952,381 J/TH).