Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell Mini Doge II
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max II | Specification | Goldshell Mini Doge II |
|---|---|---|
| 540.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 420.0 MH/s |
| 3,200 W | Consommation électrique | 400 W |
| 5,925,925.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 952,381.0 J/TH |
| 85 dB | Niveau de bruit | 35 dB |
| 12.5 kg | Weight | 2.3 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,365 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 69/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max II
Goldshell Mini Doge II
Based on BTC price of $78,139 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell Mini Doge II comes out ahead — it takes 5 of 5 (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 88% better power draw (3,200 vs 400 W) in the Goldshell Mini Doge II's favour. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell Mini Doge II diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell AE Max II 29% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell Mini Doge II 88% better power draw (3,200 vs 400 W)
- Goldshell Mini Doge II 84% better efficacité (5,925,926 vs 952,381 J/TH)
- Goldshell Mini Doge II 59% better noise (85.0 vs 35.0 dB)
- Goldshell Mini Doge II 82% better weight (12.5 vs 2.3 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max II 700% more heat output (10,918 vs 1,365 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell Mini Doge II 138% more score de minage domestique (29.0 vs 69.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AE Max II | Metric | Goldshell Mini Doge II |
|---|---|---|
| $1,050 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $258 |
| -$7.68 | Daily net profit | -$0.96 |
| -$3,853 | Net after 1 year | -$608 |
| -$6,656 | Net after 2 years | -$959 |
| -$9,460 | Net after 3 years | -$1,309 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell Mini Doge IIScore: 69/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell Mini Doge II952,381.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AE Max II or Goldshell Mini Doge II more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell Mini Doge II is more profitable at $-0.96/day compared to $-7.68/day for the Goldshell AE Max II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE Max II or the Goldshell Mini Doge II better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell Mini Doge II is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell AE Max II at 85 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE Max II or Goldshell Mini Doge II?
The Goldshell Mini Doge II scores 69/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 29/100 for the Goldshell AE Max II). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell Mini Doge II: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AE Max II runs at 5,925,925.9 J/TH while the Goldshell Mini Doge II runs at 952,381.0 J/TH — a difference of 4,973,545.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 84% better efficacité (5,925,926 vs 952,381 J/TH).