Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) vs Elphapex DG Home 1
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) | Specification | Elphapex DG Home 1 |
|---|---|---|
| 9.2 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 2.0 GH/s |
| 3,425 W | Consommation électrique | 620 W |
| 373,908.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 310,000.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 50 dB |
| 15,000.0 kg | Weight | 10.0 kg |
| 11,686 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,115 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 58/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Elphapex |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh)
Elphapex DG Home 1
Based on BTC price of $78,223 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Elphapex DG Home 1 edges it: 4 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 82% better power draw (3,425 vs 620 W). That said, the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) and Elphapex DG Home 1 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) 358% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Elphapex DG Home 1 82% better power draw (3,425 vs 620 W)
- Elphapex DG Home 1 17% better efficacité (373,908 vs 310,000 J/TH)
- Elphapex DG Home 1 100% better weight (15,000.0 vs 10.0 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) 452% more heat output (11,686 vs 2,115 BTU/hr)
- Elphapex DG Home 1 164% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 58.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) | Metric | Elphapex DG Home 1 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,599 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $510 |
| -$8.22 | Daily net profit | -$1.49 |
| -$4,599 | Net after 1 year | -$1,053 |
| -$7,599 | Net after 2 years | -$1,596 |
| -$10,600 | Net after 3 years | -$2,140 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Elphapex DG Home 1Score: 58/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Elphapex DG Home 1310,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) vs Elphapex DG Home 1: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Elphapex DG Home 1 is more profitable at $-1.49/day compared to $-8.22/day for the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) or Elphapex DG Home 1?
The Elphapex DG Home 1 is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) vs Elphapex DG Home 1: which fits a residential setup better?
The Elphapex DG Home 1 scores 58/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) vs Elphapex DG Home 1: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) runs at 373,908.3 J/TH while the Elphapex DG Home 1 runs at 310,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 63,908.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 17% better efficacité (373,908 vs 310,000 J/TH).