Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) vs Goldshell LT5
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) | Specification | Goldshell LT5 |
|---|---|---|
| 9.5 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 2.1 GH/s |
| 3,425 W | Consommation électrique | 2,080 W |
| 360,526.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,014,634.2 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 15,000.0 kg | Weight | 8,500.0 kg |
| 11,686 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,097 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh)
Goldshell LT5
Based on BTC price of $78,183 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 363% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh)'s favour. That said, the Goldshell LT5 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) and Goldshell LT5 sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) 363% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell LT5 39% better power draw (3,425 vs 2,080 W)
- Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) 64% better efficacité (360,526 vs 1,014,634 J/TH)
- Goldshell LT5 43% better weight (15,000 vs 8,500 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) 65% more heat output (11,686 vs 7,097 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell LT5 18% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) | Metric | Goldshell LT5 |
|---|---|---|
| $821 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $8,364 |
| -$8.22 | Daily net profit | -$4.99 |
| -$3,822 | Net after 1 year | -$10,186 |
| -$6,822 | Net after 2 years | -$12,008 |
| -$9,822 | Net after 3 years | -$13,830 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell LT5Score: 26/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh)360,526.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) vs Goldshell LT5: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell LT5 is more profitable at $-4.99/day compared to $-8.22/day for the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) vs Goldshell LT5: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) vs Goldshell LT5: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell LT5 scores 26/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) and Goldshell LT5?
The Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) runs at 360,526.3 J/TH while the Goldshell LT5 runs at 1,014,634.2 J/TH — a difference of 654,107.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 64% better efficacité (360,526 vs 1,014,634 J/TH).