Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd |
|---|---|---|
| 14.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 580.0 TH/s |
| 1,350 W | Consommation électrique | 5,510 W |
| 96.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 9.5 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 6.0 kg | Weight | 13.5 kg |
| 4,606 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 18,800 BTU/hr |
| 59/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd
Based on BTC price of $78,217 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 4043% more hashrate (14.0 vs 580.0 TH/s). That said, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) and Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 4043% more hashrate (14.0 vs 580.0 TH/s)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 75% better power draw (1,350 vs 5,510 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 90% better efficacité (96.4 vs 9.5 J/TH)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 27% better noise (55.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 56% better weight (6.0 vs 13.5 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 308% more heat output (4,606 vs 18,800 BTU/hr)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 97% more score de minage domestique (59.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd |
|---|---|---|
| $349 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $12,995 |
| -$2.74 | Daily net profit | $7.65 |
| -$1,348 | Net after 1 year | -$10,202 |
| -$2,346 | Net after 2 years | -$7,409 |
| -$3,345 | Net after 3 years | -$4,615 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Takes ~4.7 years to pay back at current rates |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd$10.39/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)Score: 59/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd9.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd is more profitable at $7.65/day compared to $-2.74/day for the Antminer Loki Edition (S9). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) scores 59/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) runs at 96.4 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd runs at 9.5 J/TH — a difference of 86.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 90% better efficacité (96.4 vs 9.5 J/TH).