Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Bitaxe GT
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Specification | Bitaxe GT |
|---|---|---|
| 14.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 2.2 TH/s |
| 1,350 W | Consommation électrique | 43 W |
| 96.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 20.0 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Niveau de bruit | 42 dB |
| 6.0 kg | Weight | 0.4 kg |
| 4,606 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 147 BTU/hr |
| 59/100 | Home Mining Score | 64/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
Bitaxe GT
Based on BTC price of $59,671 and current network difficulty as of Jun 6, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Bitaxe GT l'emporte sur 4 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 97% better power draw (1,350.0 vs 43.0 W). That said, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) and Bitaxe GT actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 551% more hashrate (14.0 vs 2.2 TH/s)
- Bitaxe GT 97% better power draw (1,350.0 vs 43.0 W)
- Bitaxe GT 79% better efficacité (96.4 vs 20.0 J/TH)
- Bitaxe GT 24% better noise (55.0 vs 42.0 dB)
- Bitaxe GT 93% better weight (6.0 vs 0.4 kg)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 3040% more heat output (4,606 vs 147 BTU/hr)
- Bitaxe GT 8% more score de minage domestique (59.0 vs 64.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Metric | Bitaxe GT |
|---|---|---|
| $349 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $499 |
| -$2.86 | Daily net profit | -$0.05 |
| -$1,394 | Net after 1 year | -$515 |
| -$2,438 | Net after 2 years | -$532 |
| -$3,483 | Net after 3 years | -$548 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitaxe GTScore: 64/100. 42 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitaxe GT20.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Foire aux questions
Is the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or Bitaxe GT more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitaxe GT is more profitable at $-0.05/day compared to $-2.86/day for the Antminer Loki Edition (S9). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or the Bitaxe GT better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Bitaxe GT is quieter at 42 dB compared to the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) at 55 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Bitaxe GT: which fits a residential setup better?
The Bitaxe GT scores 64/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 59/100 for the Antminer Loki Edition (S9)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) and Bitaxe GT on J/TH?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) runs at 96.4 J/TH while the Bitaxe GT runs at 20.0 J/TH — a difference of 76.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 79% better efficacité (96.4 vs 20.0 J/TH).