Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs GMO miner B3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Specification | GMO miner B3 |
|---|---|---|
| 14.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 33.0 TH/s |
| 1,350 W | Consommation électrique | 3,417 W |
| 96.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 103.6 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 6.0 kg | Weight | 5,000.0 kg |
| 4,606 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,659 BTU/hr |
| 59/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | GMO miner |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
GMO miner B3
Based on BTC price of $78,230 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Antminer Loki Edition (S9), which leads on 4 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 60% better power draw (1,350 vs 3,417 W). That said, the GMO miner B3 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) and GMO miner B3 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- GMO miner B3 136% more hashrate (14.0 vs 33.0 TH/s)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 60% better power draw (1,350 vs 3,417 W)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 7% better efficacité (96.4 vs 103.6 J/TH)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 100% better weight (6.0 vs 5,000.0 kg)
- GMO miner B3 153% more heat output (4,606 vs 11,659 BTU/hr)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 168% more score de minage domestique (59.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Metric | GMO miner B3 |
|---|---|---|
| $349 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$2.74 | Daily net profit | -$7.01 |
| -$1,348 | Net after 1 year | -$2,560 |
| -$2,346 | Net after 2 years | -$5,119 |
| -$3,345 | Net after 3 years | -$7,679 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)Score: 59/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)96.4 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs GMO miner B3: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) is more profitable at $-2.74/day compared to $-7.01/day for the GMO miner B3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs GMO miner B3: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) is quieter at 55 dB compared to the GMO miner B3 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or the GMO miner B3?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) scores 59/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the GMO miner B3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer Loki Edition (S9) and GMO miner B3?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) runs at 96.4 J/TH while the GMO miner B3 runs at 103.6 J/TH — a difference of 7.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 7% better efficacité (96.4 vs 103.6 J/TH).