Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Specification | Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) |
|---|---|---|
| 14.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 137.0 GH/s |
| 1,350 W | Consommation électrique | 3 W |
| 96.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 18.3 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 6.0 kg | Weight | — |
| 4,606 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 9 BTU/hr |
| 59/100 | Home Mining Score | — |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | Intel |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2)
Based on BTC price of $78,130 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Scored side by side, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) and Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) trade blows evenly. Neither pulls ahead decisively, so the deciding factor is which spec matters most to your setup — the panels above lay that out.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) and Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) sit on each measurable spec:
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 10119% more hashrate (14.0 vs 0.1 TH/s)
- Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) 100% better power draw (1,350.0 vs 2.5 W)
- Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) 81% better efficacité (96.4 vs 18.3 J/TH)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 54091% more heat output (4,606.2 vs 8.5 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Metric | Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) |
|---|---|---|
| $349 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$2.74 | Daily net profit | -$0.00 |
| -$1,348 | Net after 1 year | -$0 |
| -$2,347 | Net after 2 years | -$1 |
| -$3,346 | Net after 3 years | -$1 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)Score: 59/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2)18.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) is more profitable at $0.00/day compared to $-2.74/day for the Antminer Loki Edition (S9). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2): which runs at a lower noise level?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2)?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) scores 59/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) runs at 96.4 J/TH while the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) runs at 18.3 J/TH — a difference of 78.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 81% better efficacité (96.4 vs 18.3 J/TH).